Economic Value of Environmental Services of Swamp Land Ecosystem (A Case Study in the Hulu Sungai Utara Regency, Kalimantan Selatan)

Main Article Content

Hamadani Hamdani
Djoko Santoso
Rifiana Rifiana

Abstract

About 22,000 hectares are planned to be converted to oil palm plantations by the local government. However, this area has been the source of livelihood for the Banjar people for generations. This economic-environmental services valuation was carried out using a total valuation approach. Previous studies have shown that swamps have economic benefits as a source of water for rice farming (Oryza sativa), timber (Melaleuca cajuputi), fisheries, handicraft crops (Eleocharis dulcis), and for drinking water. They also have ecological benefits in biological functions such as fish feed and breeding grounds, Galam (Melaleuca leucadendron) breeding, water storage, carbonate stocks, and biodiversity value. The total economic value was 21.3 million IDR per ha, with a ratio of the economic value of 7.15% and the value of ecosystem services (ecological) of 92.85%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hamdani, H., Santoso, D., & Rifiana, R. (2022). Economic Value of Environmental Services of Swamp Land Ecosystem (A Case Study in the Hulu Sungai Utara Regency, Kalimantan Selatan). TROPICAL WETLAND JOURNAL, 8(1), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.20527/twj.v8i1.109
Section
Articles

References

Asikin,S. dan M. Thamrin, 2012. Manfaat Tanaman Purun Tikus (Eleocharis dulcis) Pada Ekosistem lahan Sawah Rawa. [Benefits of Purun Tikus (Eleocharis dulcis) Plants in the Swamp Rice Field Ecosystem]. Journal litbang pertanian. 31(1), 2012.
Malabika B. Roy, Pankaj K. Roy, Nihar R. Samal, Asis Mazumdar.2012. Socioeconomic Valuations of Wetland Based Occupations of Lower Gangetic Basin through Participatory Approach. Environment and Natural Resources Research. Vol 2.No.4: 30-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v2n4p30.
Nautiyal.S., Rama Rao, N., 2012. Ecological and socioeconomic impacts of conservation policies in biodiversity hotspots: a case study from Rajiv Gandhi National Park, India. Journal of Environmental Studies and sciences. June 2012, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 165-177.Doi.10.1007/s13412-011-0052-x
Swinton.S.M., Frank Lupi, G.P. Robertson, and D.A.Landis, 2006. Ecosystems Services from Agriculture: Looking Beyond the Usual Suspects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol.88, (5), 2006 :1160-1164
Noor, M. 2007. Rawa Lebak. Ekologi, pemanfaatan dan Pengembanganya. [Lebak Swamp. Ecology, utilization, and development] Divisi Perguruan tinggi. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Norbah, S.2011. Plantation Development Policy in South Kalimantan. Plantation Development Coordination Workshop policies Palm Oil Development on Wetlands, South Kalimantan.
Tietenberg, T. (1998). Environmental Economics and Policy. Addison-Wesley, Reading
The Centre for social and economic research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), 1994 Economic Value and the Environment in the Development World, A Report to the UNEP, Nairobi.
Turner, K. dan Pearce, D. (1991) Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. The Johns University Press.
Wardiono. 2007. Eleocharis dulcis Burm.f.) Trinius ex Henschell. http://www.Kehati.or.id/prohati/browser.php/docsid=478. Tanggal 23 April 2008